Reply to David Still's email
You are in my inbox. There are a lot of messages awaiting a reply.
Click on the sender's name and reply to the messages

 

Subject: Re: third grade teacher
I journal and send tons of correspondence (via US Mail) and I write prayers.
Love, Ang

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Still" <david@davidstill.org>

> now Angela if you are not going to do any sort of light or serious writing than do read a book for leisure and if you still bent on not writing nor reading than do encourage Sean to read for leisure... he misses it so
e Angie Fach

5 Feb 2002 16:02:23
     
e D Furness
<furngully88@hotmail.com>
5 Feb 2002 02:02:28
Subject: Re: Cunt

thank you sir, may i have another?


>From: David Still <david@davidstill.org>
>You are a fucking cunt.
     
Subject: RE: Is it me or is it you?
e Raul Esteve Soto
<resteves@uoc.edu>
5 Feb 2002 02:02:42
     
e Sarah Caufield
<whither@vcn.bc.ca>
5 Feb 2002 01:02:58
Subject: Re: Well hello there!
> My goodness it's been a while since we've talked! We've really got to
> keep in closer contact. Friends are important, you know, especially in
> this period of global warming. You never know if one day I might
> appear on your doorstep with a toque to sell.
> All my love,
>
> David Still

and i sincerely hope that one day you do appear on my doorstep selling toques! with only two to choose from, my wardrobe is quickly becoming a bore. it's such a surprise to hear from you, and i am terribly glad to hear that the aliens didn't abduct you afterall. i heard a number of rumours but was never entirely sure of the source. you know what they say, "if global warming doesn't get you, aliens will."

still. good to hear from you.
sarah
     
Subject: Re: Yr Media-L comments
Keep living in your little life, behind your little name. Oh but that's right! You hide behind a false identity. Perhaps you are Peter Clayton. I will have to forward your messages to him directly, but before I even do that I will have the local police investigate. You'd be amazed at the technology that is available. Didn't the FBI just arrest a 16-year-old? Yes they did.

Either way, if you are not involved, then keep your disgusting comments to yourself. Your so stupid, that you can't even spell! Why don't you check a dictionary or perhaps use something as simplistic as a spell checker.

You obviously don't know anything and you will not prevent me or anyone else from speaking out. So go find a little hole to crawl in and stay there.

By the way, I sent your message to a number of your Canadian counterparts. So I am sure that if your name ever does turn up , the brilliance of your comments will follow.

As of right now, the list suffers because you are on it. So do us all a favor and get out.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Still

Eueeew! Touched a nerve did we? Your reply is as illiterate as your Media-L post in the first place.

Dunno who Peter Clayton is, and don't care. What I do care about is getting you to stop posting in public places unless and until you get someone to teach you the proper use of the English language.

Maybe you're not a native speaker? Let's see...Belinda De Abreu... Haitian perhaps? Or maybe Quebecois? If so, then your illiteracy is less egregious, but inadequate none-the-less.

Send me your comments in advance in future if you like, I'll correct them and send them back BEFORE you post. That way you won't look so stupid and the list will not suffer as a result.

What do you say?

David
e BELINHA DE ABREU
<deabreu1@msn.com>
4 Feb 2002 21:02:52
     
e 

4 Feb 2002 21:02:39
Subject: Re: Is it me or is it you?
ok i have figured your game out nice i give you a hand ! i saw the web site ! now please let me know who u are
     
Subject: life insurance quotes
David, I tried to reach you today at the 561-533-6618 number, but the man that answered the phone said that no one lived there by this name. If you're still interested in quotes for life insurance please call us toll free @ 866-579-2052. We need to verify the information you left online and then we'll be able to quote you every carrier in North America. We are brokers so we're not tied to one company. Thanks, David.
Nanci Ciarrocchi
e Lauren Brando
<lbrando74@hotmail.com>
4 Feb 2002 20:02:19
     
e wewillkillyou
<wewillchangeyourlife@wewillkillyou.com>
4 Feb 2002 17:02:45
Subject: Re: change my life please!!!
we appreciate any percentage of sincerity in your first email. and appreciate any further kind and personal correspondance. id just like to make that clear. but otherwise.... you know the drill.
     
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Playing the hero?
Ok, your name is not david but your real name is DAVID !!!!!
First I don't understand your obsession not to tell me your real identity , second I don't understand why you write me, I mean: how did you get my address ? Is it chance , destiny or just a big joke ?
e 

4 Feb 2002 15:02:15
     
e famke schaap
<famkeschaap@hotmail.com>
4 Feb 2002 13:02:07
Subject: Re: sure

quite right. yes i'm a very dutch girl, and i'm living in the netherlands, amsterdam actually, but i guess americans don't really consider our country as a real country and think we speak american language which is all but true. Pleased to meet you too.


>From: David Still
>
>Are you in the Netherlands now? Im just curious. I hope im not wrong but that is where frysian is from right? I am from the US. Famke = 'little girl' that is a sweet name as well as beautiful. But at 1.84 meters the name refers to that little girl (inner child) more now than your actual height :) Anyway, enough of my babbling. . :) Its a pleasure to 'meet' you. Take care and best wishes.

>DangerMouse
     
Subject: Re: change my life please!!!
practice, my friend, practice.
but.... two things:
1) we dont do fags who send anonymous emails. thats *SO* five years ago.
2) fags are cigarettes which make your teeth yella and ya breath stink. stop usin em.

you wana get in touch wit me for real, fine, then we'll talk about ya life and the benjamins. othawise, get the hell outta my face, k?
*wearetheworld, wearethechildren.


> hi guys-
> i really dig your site bro's. i was just wondering how DID you get to be the superstars that you are? i would LOVE it if we could talk "business". how much money do i have to pay you to pimp my site out to the MAX??? lemme know, i think it'd be really cool if we could get some crrrrazy ass enterprise business venture goin on. well lemme know what you guys think...
yewww crrrazy assed hooligans
>
> ~david
e wewillkillyou
<wewillchangeyourlife@wewillkillyou.com>
4 Feb 2002 05:02:13
     
e John Dempsey

4 Feb 2002 02:02:15
Subject: A typical reply to a typical line of insult
>Why are you so concerned with this?

It is unethical without removal mechanisms, and I am a victim of its failings.

>You do know that you have the choice to block the emails from
>coming into your account right?

Yep. And once I learned that, I felt a bit better. But for the remaining dolts who don't know that, and for their ISP's carrying the freight of unwanted correspondence, I'm still interested in a solution.

>If you keep responding to these messages you are going to
>keep receiving these emails.

Is this simple extortion? What if my messages say, "I do not wish to be contacted again"? Why should that message inspire *even more* replies? Cuz anonymizers are unethical and prone to abuse, is why.
     
Subject: Re: meating, latex, and collies

lick it.


-------------------
The contents of this email and any attachments are sent solely for the person to whom it is addressed. It contains privileged and confidential information. Since you are the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is authorised - please notify the sender by replying and do not delete the message.
e paul marek
<xestolabus@hotmail.com>
3 Feb 2002 23:02:04
     
e Aileen Calderon
<acalderon@rmwc.edu>
3 Feb 2002 21:02:10
Subject: RE: hey you
Hi, how did oscar get my email address? and who are u? and yes i do have a pic but until you answer my question im not sending it. -aileen

-----Original Message-----
From: David Still
hey girl
oscar gave me your e-mail address and said that you were really hot. i really want to meet you. you have any sexy pics? give me a ring.
~david
     
Subject: Re: Yr Media-L comments
At least you understand the meaning of an oxymoron, you fool!

---<>You fat silly cow<---What a disgusting human being you must be.

It must be nice to live in a glass box.
My grammar is not up to your standards, how sad! I hope you are not a teacher of any kind, you ignorant man. What exactly do you have to say that is so important that is not so vile? You must be a friend of Peter Clayton.

Are you anyone at all?
Just another pompous ass who feels he can go on the attack and be well received. Have you studied anything? Do you even understand media literacy? Please! You have learned to be rude, and disgusting.

Who am I? Someone who is working damn hard to get a lot of work done in this field. Perhaps I should have taken the time to edit, but I was not so inclined after watching the atrocities of some of the other individuals.

God forbid, that you are anyone of importance in media literacy because you will be searched out, and if I have anything to do with it, dismissed.

Please get back into your glass cage. You belong there.

----- Original Message -----You fat silly cow
From: David Still

God forbid you're actually teaching in a classroom!!!

What exactly is a 'mute discussion?' An oxymoron if I ever heard one.

Maybe before you go off whining on the Media-L or any other list, you should take a course in English, composition, and grammar.

Your ignorance is superceded only by your arrogance in lecturing to the list. Just because you have a computer and a modem it does not make you an authority--on anything--especially, in your case apparently, on literacy.
e BELINHA DE ABREU
<deabreu1@msn.com>
3 Feb 2002 16:02:56
     
e 

3 Feb 2002 16:02:07
Subject: Re: Is it me or is it you?
whats wrong u cant e-mail me anymore you stupid fuck! What a jerk off loser with alot of time own his hands. i won u lost sucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
Subject: Re: Inbox insults by category
>You know, for someone that doesnt appreciate these emails,
>you sure spend alot of time responding to them.

Snide and not even logical.
The ACLU doesn't appreciate cross-burnings, either.
e John Dempsey

3 Feb 2002 07:02:42
     
e Kim Meyer
<kmey006@hotmail.com>
3 Feb 2002 06:02:50
Subject: Random
Hi David

So I don't know you at all. Have in fact never met you or spoken to you until recently. How did you get my email address in the first place then?

Your life sounds idyllic. Especially the bit about a small house on the side of a lake etc.

I have to go now. I've just been tramping for 4 days and I'm tired & need food.

Bye
Kim
     
Subject: Re: Internet Ivan Will Bury You
>I don't think it would take much longer than the time in which
>you were bumped off the front page of replies.

Actually, there was substantial delay between my first, innocent response, and a reply. And with what I've said so far, I imagine I'll be quite popular for months to come. But why should I have to accept anything less than the idea that someone who doesn't want to play does not have to? I have block so for me this is a matter of ethics, not personal anxiety.
e John Dempsey

2 Feb 2002 23:02:29
     
e 
<jaka@jaka.org>
2 Feb 2002 20:02:53
Subject: Vdor21/Break21
     
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214